NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 19 billion / sec
- 7.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 64
- 7.3x better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3221
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3221
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 December 2010 vs 3 March 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s vs 19 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops vs 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3221 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
- 2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 732 MHz
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 219 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 708.853 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3221 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 679 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GF110 | G94 |
| Launch date | 7 December 2010 | 3 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Place in performance rating | 789 | 791 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s | 19 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PureVideo HD | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 450
