NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 5.3x more texture fill rate: 19 billion / sec vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 64 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 679 vs 128
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 220
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 1 March 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion / sec vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 679 vs 128 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 vs 220 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 679 | 128 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | 220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3221 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G94 | G73 |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 1 March 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 780 | 783 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 450 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion / sec | 3.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Transistor count | 505 million | 177 million |
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 350 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 128 / 64 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 |