NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 4.1x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 19 billion / sec
  • 15x more pipelines: 960 vs 64
  • 10.3x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 192 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3999 vs 679
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 308
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3221
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3221
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 September 2012 vs 3 March 2009
Texture fill rate 78.4 billion / sec vs 19 billion / sec
Pipelines 960 vs 64
Floating-point performance 1,981 gflops vs 192 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3999 vs 679
PassMark - G2D Mark 479 vs 308
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3365 vs 3221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3365 vs 3221

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

  • Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 980 MHz
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 140 Watt
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 980 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 140 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3999
679
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
479
308
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3365
3221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3365
3221
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3999 679
PassMark - G2D Mark 479 308
Geekbench - OpenCL 11370
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3365 3221
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3365 3221
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1307

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Tesla
Code name GK106 G94
Launch date 6 September 2012 3 March 2009
Launch price (MSRP) $229
Place in performance rating 776 777
Price now $349.99
Type Desktop Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 14.35

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1033 MHz
Core clock speed 980 MHz 1500 MHz
CUDA cores 960 64
Floating-point performance 1,981 gflops 192 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 960 64
Texture fill rate 78.4 billion / sec 19 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 2,540 million 505 million
Gigaflops 288

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal S / PDIF
Display Connectors One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin
Laptop size large
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.3 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 144.2 GB / s 51 GB / s
Memory bus width 192-bit GDDR5 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0
PureVideo HD