NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 19 billion / sec
  • 7x more pipelines: 448 vs 64
  • 5.4x better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 192 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 308
  • Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1306 vs 679
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 July 2011 vs 3 March 2009
Texture fill rate 32.1 GTexel / s vs 19 billion / sec
Pipelines 448 vs 64
Floating-point performance 1,027.7 gflops vs 192 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 444 vs 308
PassMark - G3D Mark 1306 vs 679

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

  • 2.6x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 574 MHz
  • 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 225 Watt
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 574 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 225 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
444
308
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1306
679
Name NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 93.533
PassMark - G2D Mark 444 308
PassMark - G3D Mark 1306 679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3221

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Tesla
Code name GF100 G94
Launch date 25 July 2011 3 March 2009
Launch price (MSRP) $5,489
Place in performance rating 777 778
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 574 MHz 1500 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,027.7 gflops 192 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 448 64
Texture fill rate 32.1 GTexel / s 19 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 3,100 million 505 million
CUDA cores 64
Gigaflops 288

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size large
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 150.3 GB / s 51 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 3132 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0
PureVideo HD