NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 50 PCI
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 50 PCI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 6x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 19x more texture fill rate: 19 billion / sec vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 31 May 2005 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion / sec vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 50 PCI
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 60 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 50 PCI
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 50 PCI |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 679 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3221 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 50 PCI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Celsius |
Code name | G94 | NV18 A4 |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 31 May 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 791 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 250 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion / sec | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB / s | 1.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 32 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |