NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 24x more pipelines: 96 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 130 nm
- 184.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 554 vs 3
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 1 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 554 vs 3 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 70 vs 50
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 70 vs 50 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
GPU 2: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 554 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 70 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8215 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | PowerVR SGX5 |
Code name | GT215 | GMA 500 |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 1 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1537 | 1538 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 200 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | |
Transistor count | 727 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | HDMIVGALVDSSingle Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |