NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K1 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K1

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 70% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 25.9x more texture fill rate: 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s
• 8x more pipelines: 4x 192 vs 96
• 5.4x better floating-point performance: 4x 326.4 gflops vs 240 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 4x 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 651 vs 554
• 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 259 vs 50

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M

• 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 130 Watt
• 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8215 vs 1976

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K1
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	651 554
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	259 50
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1976 8215

Compare specifications (specs)