NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 and NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 9x more texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 650 MHz
- 10.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 vs 126
- 11.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 vs 28
- 13.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 244
- 13.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 244
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2010 vs 15 May 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 vs 28 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 244 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 244 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 24 Watt vs 106 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 24 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 | 28 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 244 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 244 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Curie |
| Code name | GF106 | G73 |
| Launch date | 13 September 2010 | 15 May 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | $149.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1130 | 1696 |
| Price now | $64.99 | $149.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.46 | 0.94 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz | 350 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec | 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt | 24 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 177 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.7 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | 650 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
ATIRadeon 9600
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
NVIDIATesla C1060
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
AMDRadeon E6760
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM
