NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1518 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8368 vs 7988
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8368 vs 7988
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 May 2018 vs 31 January 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 vs 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 vs 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3699 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5149 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 21 May 2018 | 31 January 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 326 | 527 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,313 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
| Texture fill rate | 89.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 240 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
