NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8255 vs 5092
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10140 vs 8368
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10140 vs 8368
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 21 May 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8255 vs 5092 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 vs 8368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 vs 8368 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1518 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 587 vs 341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 587 vs 341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8255 | 5092 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | 587 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 8368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 8368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU106 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 21 May 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 337 | 335 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1518 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 3,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
