NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 95% higher boost clock speed: 1518 MHz vs 780 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3341
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3341
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 370
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5119 vs 1090
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 May 2018 vs 30 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 370 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5119 vs 1090 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3355 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 370 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5119 | 1090 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Oland |
Launch date | 21 May 2018 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 334 | 699 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3 |