NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro D300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and AMD FirePro D300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 6054
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 6054
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 999 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 vs 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 vs 6054 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 68 GTexel / s vs 53.12 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 2,176 gflops vs 1,700 gflops
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20101 vs 14675
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1341
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 68 GTexel / s vs 53.12 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops vs 1,700 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20101 vs 14675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | AMD FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4055 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14675 | 20101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 | 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1491 | 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1341 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 | 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1491 | 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1341 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2076 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | AMD FirePro D300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 18 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 701 | 704 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1328 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 999 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Length | 242 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 162.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro D300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
