NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 M440
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R7 M440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 53.12 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 1,700 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4020 vs 897
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 285 vs 170
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12601 vs 5598
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 1935
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 1935
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops vs 653.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4020 vs 897 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 285 vs 170 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12601 vs 5598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 vs 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 vs 1935 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 999 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1491
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2537 vs 1341
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1491
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2537 vs 1341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1021 MHz vs 999 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2537 vs 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2537 vs 1341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M440
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R7 M440 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4020 | 897 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 285 | 170 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12601 | 5598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 | 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1491 | 2067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1341 | 2537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 | 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1491 | 2067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1341 | 2537 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2076 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R7 M440 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Meso |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 656 | 1112 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1328 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 999 MHz | 1021 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | 653.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s | 20.42 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |

