NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 53.12 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 1,700 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 1401.6x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4042 vs 3904
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12690 vs 11317
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 4843
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 4843
- Around 64% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2076 vs 1265
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1328 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4042 vs 3904 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12690 vs 11317 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 vs 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 vs 4843 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2076 vs 1265 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 999 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 512 vs 289
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1341
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 999 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 512 vs 289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 1341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4042 | 3904 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 | 512 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12690 | 11317 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1491 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1341 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1491 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1341 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2076 | 1265 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 18 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 700 | 703 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $299.01 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1328 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 999 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 53.12 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 140 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro 7000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000M
