NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 53.12 GTexel / s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 51% better floating-point performance: 1,700 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4020 vs 2259
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 285 vs 213
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12601 vs 9584
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 4330
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 4330
• 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2076 vs 999

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1491
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1341
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1491
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4020 2259
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	285 213
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12601 9584
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6614 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1491 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1341 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6614 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1491 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1341 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2076 999

Compare specifications (specs)