NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 30% higher core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 771 MHz
Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 784 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14675 vs 12186
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 6373
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 6373

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 January 2018 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed	999 MHz vs 771 MHz
Boost clock speed	1328 MHz vs 784 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 108 Watt
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	14675 vs 12186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6614 vs 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6614 vs 6373

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 53.12 GTexel / s
2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
Around 24% better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 1,700 gflops
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4326 vs 4073
Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 288
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 1491
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 1341
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 1491
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 1341

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	87.81 GTexel / s vs 53.12 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 vs 640
Floating-point performance	2,107 gflops vs 1,700 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4326 vs 4073
PassMark - G2D Mark	502 vs 288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3382 vs 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3311 vs 1341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3382 vs 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3311 vs 1341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4073

4326

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

288

502

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14675

12186

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6614

6373

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1491

3382

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1341

3311

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6614

6373

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1491

3382

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1341

3311

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G3D Mark	4073	4326
PassMark - G2D Mark	288	502
Geekbench - OpenCL	14675	12186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6614	6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1491	3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1341	3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6614	6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1491	3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1341	3311
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2076	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		70.194

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	GP107	GK104
Launch date	3 January 2018	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	699	702
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$854.99
Price now		$446.99
Value for money (0-100)		11.92
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1328 MHz	784 MHz
Core clock speed	999 MHz	771 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,700 gflops	2,107 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	1344
Texture fill rate	53.12 GTexel / s	87.81 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	108 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Length		241 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB / s	172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0