NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 30% higher core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 771 MHz
  • Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 784 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
  • Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
  • Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14675 vs 12186
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 6373
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 6373
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2018 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed 999 MHz vs 771 MHz
Boost clock speed 1328 MHz vs 784 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 14675 vs 12186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6614 vs 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6614 vs 6373

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

  • Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 53.12 GTexel / s
  • 2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
  • Around 24% better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 1,700 gflops
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4329 vs 4073
  • Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 503 vs 288
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 1491
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 1341
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 1491
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 1341
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 87.81 GTexel / s vs 53.12 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1344 vs 640
Floating-point performance 2,107 gflops vs 1,700 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4329 vs 4073
PassMark - G2D Mark 503 vs 288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3382 vs 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3311 vs 1341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3382 vs 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3311 vs 1341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4073
4329
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
288
503
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
14675
12186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6614
6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1491
3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1341
3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6614
6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1491
3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1341
3311
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G3D Mark 4073 4329
PassMark - G2D Mark 288 503
Geekbench - OpenCL 14675 12186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6614 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1491 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1341 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6614 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1491 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1341 3311
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2076 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 70.194

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Kepler
Code name GP107 GK104
Launch date 3 January 2018 22 July 2014
Place in performance rating 699 702
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $854.99
Price now $446.99
Value for money (0-100) 11.92

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1328 MHz 784 MHz
Core clock speed 999 MHz 771 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,700 gflops 2,107 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 1344
Texture fill rate 53.12 GTexel / s 87.81 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 108 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Length 241 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.1 GB / s 172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 5400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0