NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R7 M270DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 940 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 962
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 233
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 11 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 940 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 vs 962 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 vs 233 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R7 M270DX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 | 962 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 233 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2089 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R7 M270DX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP106B | Topaz |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 11 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 643 | 640 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 940 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 59.72 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |