NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs AMD FirePro W5100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 930 MHz
• Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• Around 34% better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 2989
• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16863 vs 12158
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 35.15
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.199
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 163.258
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 4397
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 3688
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 4397
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 3688

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 538 vs 292
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 799.414
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 vs 30.523

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4462 2989
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	292 538
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	16863 12158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.209 35.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	799.414 838.518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.536 3.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.523 57.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	223.683 163.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3356

Compare specifications (specs)