NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon R7 360

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R7 360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 6.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 3105
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17437 vs 16433
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 38.068
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.386
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 188.858
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 4799
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 4799
• Around 49% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2089 vs 1402

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360

• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 292
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 vs 799.414
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 vs 30.523
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3721
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3721

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4462 3105
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	292 513
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17437 16433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.209 38.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	799.414 819.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.536 3.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.523 58.285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	223.683 188.858
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2089 1402

Compare specifications (specs)