NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon R7 360
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R7 360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- Around 18% better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 3106
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17485 vs 16433
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 38.068
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.386
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 188.858
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 4799
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 4799
- Around 49% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2089 vs 1402
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 59.72 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops vs 1,613 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 vs 3106 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17485 vs 16433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 vs 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 vs 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 vs 188.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 vs 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 vs 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2089 vs 1402 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 292
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 vs 799.414
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 vs 30.523
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3721
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3721
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 vs 292 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 vs 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 vs 30.523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 3721 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R7 360 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 | 3106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 513 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17485 | 16433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 819.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 58.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | 188.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2089 | 1402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R7 360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP106B | Tobago |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 644 | 645 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $146.65 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 59.72 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 2,080 million |
Stream Processors | 768 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |