NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 475 MHz
• 31.4x more texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 1.9 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 130 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
• 7.4x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 950 MHz
• 75.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 vs 59
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 274

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

• Around 1% lower typical power consumption: 74 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4463 59
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	292 274

Compare specifications (specs)