AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 292
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.274 vs 30.523

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 907 MHz
• Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
• Around 3% better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
• Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 3475
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17470 vs 15566
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 41.388
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 614.695
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.837
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 189.085
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 4695
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 2280
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 4695
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 2280

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3475 4462
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 292
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15566 17470
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.388 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	614.695 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.837 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.274 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.085 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4695 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2280 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4695 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2280 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3359

Compare specifications (specs)