NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon HD 8690M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD Radeon HD 8690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 93% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 775 MHz
• 3.6x more texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• 3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 528.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 984
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17470 vs 5079
• 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 1579
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 1813
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3178
• 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 1579
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 1813
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3178

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8690M

• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 292

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8690M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4462 984
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	292 768
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17470 5079
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 1579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3178
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 1579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3178

Compare specifications (specs)