NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 823 MHz
  • Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
  • Around 69% better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 3362
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 3362
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 October 2016 vs 8 March 2011
Core clock speed 1392 MHz vs 823 MHz
Texture fill rate 66.82 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 384
Floating-point performance 2,138 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 vs 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 vs 3362

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

  • 572.6x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 7 GB/s
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 3687
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 3687
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 4008 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6895 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6895 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8496
3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3687
6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3336
3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8496
3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3687
6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3336
3352
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 6316
PassMark - G2D Mark 649
Geekbench - OpenCL 20106
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3687 6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3336 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3687 6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3336 3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2337

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Fermi 2.0
Code name GP107 GF114
Launch date 25 October 2016 8 March 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $139
Place in performance rating 473 471
Price now $159.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 46.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1392 MHz
Core clock speed 1392 MHz 823 MHz
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 2,138 gflops 1,263.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C
Pipelines 768 384
Texture fill rate 66.82 GTexel / s 52.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 170 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 1,950 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 145 mm 229 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 112 GB / s 128.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 7 GB/s 4008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready