NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 54% better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6316 vs 2411
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 649 vs 631
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20106 vs 12495
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 49.772
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 757.295
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 3.67
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 179.567
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 5157
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 5157
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6316 vs 2411 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 vs 631 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20106 vs 12495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 49.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 vs 757.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 vs 3.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 179.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 5157 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.875 vs 24.676
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3687
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3336
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3687
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 vs 24.676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 vs 3336 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6316 | 2411 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 | 631 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20106 | 12495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 49.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 757.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 3.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 49.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 179.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 7859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 7859 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2337 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Place in performance rating | 473 | 475 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 1029 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |