NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1050 MHz
2.7x more texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4500 MHz

Launch date	3 January 2018 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed	1152 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1417 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate	68.02 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Floating-point performance	2,177 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 4500 MHz

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	5320
PassMark - G2D Mark	345
Geekbench - OpenCL	19914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	54.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1159.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	82.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	293.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2219

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Code name	GP107	Oland
Launch date	3 January 2018	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	505	not rated
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1417 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	1152 MHz	1000 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,177 gflops	806.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	384
Texture fill rate	68.02 GTexel / s	25.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	65 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	1,040 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB / s	72 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	4500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready