NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 6.8x more texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
• 24x more pipelines: 768 vs 32
• 27.2x better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 80 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• 8.8x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 19.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5320 vs 270
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 328

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1152 MHz
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5320 270
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	345 328

Compare specifications (specs)