NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• 5.6x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 69.23
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 7988
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 7988
• Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 vs 1914

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950

• Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
• 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 vs 19895
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 vs 54.188
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 vs 1159.046
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 vs 5.507
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 vs 293.638
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3579
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3579

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19895 82144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.188 63.74
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1159.046 1177.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.507 5.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.067 69.23
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.638 343.81
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 7988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 7988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2219 1914

Compare specifications (specs)