NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon R7 M445

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R7 M445 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 91% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 920 MHz
• 4.2x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
• 4.2x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 939
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 176
• 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 5361
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 15.765
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 278.624
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 1.268
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 24.335
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 54.067
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 1913
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2138
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1853
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 1913
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2138
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1853

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445

• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15-25 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M445

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5918 939
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 176
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 5361
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 15.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 278.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 1.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 24.335
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 54.067
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 2138
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 2138
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 1853

Compare specifications (specs)