NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 24.6x more texture fill rate: 123.0 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 57.6x more pipelines: 1152 vs 20
- 78.7x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 50 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 22 nm
- 15.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 vs 630
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 314
- 10.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32384 vs 3210
- 13x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 vs 8.844
- 7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1325.07 vs 171.17
- 7.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 vs 1.115
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.946 vs 10.385
- 34.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 vs 12.361
- 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 988
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 1702
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 2808
- 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 988
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 1702
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 2808
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2016 vs 3 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 123.0 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 50 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 22 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 vs 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 vs 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 vs 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 vs 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 vs 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 vs 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 vs 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 vs 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 vs 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 vs 2808 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 vs 156
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 vs 156 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 156 | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | GP106 | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 18 August 2016 | 3 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 388 | 1359 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | 50 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 123.0 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |