NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R7 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R7 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 975 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 1,997 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 8.2x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 4519
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 vs 72.514
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 vs 7.267
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 359.237
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 7102
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 7102
- 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3666 vs 1499
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 62.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 1,997 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 vs 4519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 vs 72.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 vs 7.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 vs 359.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 7102 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3666 vs 1499 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 605 vs 444
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 29363
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1506.404 vs 1371.266
- 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 vs 19.803
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3654
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3654
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 605 vs 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 vs 29363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 vs 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 vs 19.803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3654 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R7 370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 | 4519 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29363 | 86561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | 72.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | 1506.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | 7.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | 116.279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | 359.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3666 | 1499 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R7 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP106B | Trinidad |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | $149 |
Place in performance rating | 401 | 407 |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | 975 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 1,997 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 62.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 152 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 975 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |