NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) versus AMD Radeon R7 370
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R7 370 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 75% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 975 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 133.6 GTexel / s versus 62.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 1024
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,275 gflops versus 1,997 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- 8.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 975 MHz
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 versus 4519
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 versus 72.514
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 versus 7.267
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 versus 359.237
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 versus 7102
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 versus 7102
- 2.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3667 versus 1499
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 975 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 133.6 GTexel / s versus 62.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 1024 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops versus 1,997 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 975 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 versus 4519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 versus 72.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 versus 7.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 versus 359.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 versus 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 versus 7102 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 versus 1499 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 370
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 605 versus 444
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 versus 29491
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1506.404 versus 1371.266
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 versus 19.803
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 3654
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 3654
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 605 versus 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 versus 29491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 versus 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 versus 19.803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3654 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R7 370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 | 4519 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29491 | 86561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | 72.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | 1506.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | 7.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | 116.279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | 359.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 | 1499 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R7 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GP106B | Trinidad |
Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $237.11 | $149 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 401 | 407 |
Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz | 975 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops | 1,997 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 133.6 GTexel / s | 62.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 110 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Longeur | 152 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 975 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |