NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 13.9x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1280 vs 320
- 11.1x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 13x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 628
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 12 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 vs 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 397 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 | 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 397 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31072 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | GP106B | R600 |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 12 December 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Place in performance rating | 392 | 393 |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 118.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |