NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 43.2 billion / sec
- 10x more pipelines: 1280 vs 128
- 9.9x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 432.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 7.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 10.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 769
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 366
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 28 March 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 43.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 432.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 vs 769 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 366 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1688 MHz vs 1506 MHz
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 | 769 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 366 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29363 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3666 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
Code name | GP106B | G92 |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 28 March 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 401 | 405 |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1688 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1280 | 128 |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 432.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | 105 °C |
Pipelines | 1280 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 43.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
SLI |