NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 736 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 118.4 GTexel / s vs 35.33 GTexel / s
- 4.4x more pipelines: 1280 vs 288
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 847.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 3828 MHz
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7846 vs 1851
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30492 vs 7032
- 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.271 vs 18.456
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1681.162 vs 618.773
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.754 vs 1.693
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.592 vs 27.232
- 8.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 416.14 vs 50.114
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 vs 2970
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3114
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 vs 2970
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3114
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 20 February 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz vs 736 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s vs 35.33 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops vs 847.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 3828 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7846 vs 1851 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30492 vs 7032 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 vs 18.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 vs 618.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 vs 1.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 vs 27.232 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 vs 50.114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 vs 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 vs 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 467 vs 402
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 vs 402 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7846 | 1851 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 467 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30492 | 7032 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 | 18.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 | 618.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 | 1.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 | 27.232 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 | 50.114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GP106 | GF114 |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 20 February 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 355 | 936 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 736 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops | 847.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s | 35.33 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 210 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 91.87 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 3828 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |