NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 44% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1063 MHz versus 736 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 118.4 GTexel / s versus 35.33 GTexel / s
- 4.4x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 288
- 4.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,789 gflops versus 847.9 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 3828 MHz
- 4.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7846 versus 1851
- 4.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 30492 versus 7032
- 8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.271 versus 18.456
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1681.162 versus 618.773
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.754 versus 1.693
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.592 versus 27.232
- 8.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 416.14 versus 50.114
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 versus 2970
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 versus 3114
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 versus 2970
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 versus 3114
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 20 February 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1063 MHz versus 736 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s versus 35.33 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 288 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops versus 847.9 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 3828 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7846 versus 1851 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30492 versus 7032 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 versus 18.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 versus 618.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 versus 1.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 versus 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 versus 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 versus 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 versus 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 versus 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 versus 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 467 versus 402
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 versus 402 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7846 | 1851 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 467 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30492 | 7032 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 | 18.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 | 618.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 | 1.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 | 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 | 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 20 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 355 | 936 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1063 MHz | 736 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops | 847.9 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 288 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s | 35.33 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 91.87 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 3828 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A570M
