NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon HD 7750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 11x more texture fill rate: 202.0 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- 3.8x more pipelines: 1920 vs 512
- 11x better floating-point performance: 6,463 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 11.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13509 vs 1191
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 693
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 3551
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 3551
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 June 2016 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 202.0 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1920 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops vs 588.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13509 vs 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750M
- 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 500x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 7750M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13509 | 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 | 693 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47422 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1063 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 7750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Chelsea |
Launch date | 10 June 2016 | 24 April 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Place in performance rating | 293 | 290 |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 575 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1920 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 202.0 GTexel / s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | |
Width | 2-slot | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |