NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 205.837
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.717 vs 25.833
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3357
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3357
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4887 vs 2231
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 10 March 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 vs 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 vs 25.833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 vs 2231 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1379 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 354.4 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
- 2x better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 5,648 gflops
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 37% higher memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 9848
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 423
- Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67670 vs 39513
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 vs 2293.496
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 12.704
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 vs 692.9
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 14915
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 14915
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1379 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops vs 5,648 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 vs 9848 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 423 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 vs 39513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 vs 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 vs 12.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 vs 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 14915 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9848 | 18598 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39513 | 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 | 2231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP104 | GP102 |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 218 | 219 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1379 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | 11,340 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 176.5 GTexel / s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 11,800 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |