NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 versus 205.837
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.717 versus 25.833
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 versus 3716
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 versus 3357
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 versus 3716
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 versus 3357
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4887 versus 2231
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 10 March 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 versus 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 versus 25.833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 versus 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 versus 2231 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1379 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 354.4 GTexel / s versus 176.5 GTexel / s
- Environ 75% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2048
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,340 gflops versus 5,648 gflops
- Environ 38% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 11 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 37% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 11008 MHz versus 8008 MHz
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 versus 9848
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 versus 423
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 67670 versus 39513
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 versus 2293.496
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 versus 12.704
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 versus 692.9
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 versus 14915
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 versus 14915
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1379 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 354.4 GTexel / s versus 176.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops versus 5,648 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 11 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz versus 8008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 versus 9848 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 versus 423 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 versus 39513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 versus 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 versus 12.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 versus 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 versus 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 versus 14915 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9848 | 18598 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39513 | 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 | 2231 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP104 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 10 March 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 218 | 219 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Prix maintenant | $826.98 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1379 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5,648 gflops | 11,340 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 3584 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 176.5 GTexel / s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 11,800 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 11 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256.3 GB / s | 484.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 352 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 11008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |