NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1379 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 275 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 7.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9937 vs 9580
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 155.307
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.704 vs 12.49
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 vs 8673
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3361
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 vs 8673
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3361

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

• Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 268.8 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
• Around 52% better floating-point performance: 8,602 gflops vs 5,648 gflops
• Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 vs 428
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 2293.496
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 vs 139.717
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 857.575 vs 692.9
• Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 4887

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9937 9580
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	428 799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	214.123 155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2293.496 3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.704 12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.717 153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	692.9 857.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14915 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8902 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8048 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14915 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8902 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8048 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4887 5170

Compare specifications (specs)