NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1379 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 7.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9936 vs 9580
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 155.307
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.704 vs 12.49
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 vs 8673
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3361
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 vs 8673
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 24 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1379 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9936 vs 9580 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 vs 155.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 vs 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 vs 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 vs 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 vs 3361 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 268.8 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- Around 52% better floating-point performance: 8,602 gflops vs 5,648 gflops
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 vs 428
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 2293.496
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 vs 139.717
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 857.575 vs 692.9
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 4887
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 268.8 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops vs 5,648 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 799 vs 428 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 vs 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 vs 139.717 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 857.575 vs 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 8902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 8902 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 vs 4887 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9936 | 9580 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 | 799 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | 155.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | 3431.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | 12.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | 153.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | 857.575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 | 5170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Fiji |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 24 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 233 | 235 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1379 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | 8,602 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 176.5 GTexel / s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 191 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Shared memory | 0 | |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |