NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 283.4 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 9,068 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 vs 39510
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 12.895
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 768.171
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 13738
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 3714
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 3356
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 13738
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 3714
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 21 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 vs 39510 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 vs 12.895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 vs 768.171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 vs 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 vs 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 661.2x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.14 vs 150.103
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2593.621 vs 2036.763
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.003 vs 27.417
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.14 vs 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2593.621 vs 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.003 vs 27.417 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 | 39510 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | 207.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | 2593.621 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | 12.895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | 145.003 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | 768.171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11768 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 722 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GM200 |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 21 March 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | $4,199.99 |
Place in performance rating | 254 | 251 |
Price now | $439.99 | $2,825 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | 4.69 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 988 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 8,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10 GB/s | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |