NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz
• Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1114 MHz
• Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 283.4 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 9,068 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 vs 39510
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 12.895
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 768.171
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 13738
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 3714
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 3356
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 13738
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 3714
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

• Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• 661.2x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 10 GB/s
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.14 vs 150.103
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2593.621 vs 2036.763
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.003 vs 27.417

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55548 39510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.103 207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2036.763 2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.035 12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.417 145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	819.934 768.171
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20151 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4646 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4195 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20151 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4646 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4195 3356

Compare specifications (specs)