NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1607 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- 223.3x more texture fill rate: 57.12 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
Launch date | 28 Jun 2022 vs 2 November 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1607 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 57.12 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- 4.8x more pipelines: 2432 vs 512
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 658
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14687 vs 4997
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55390 vs 24857
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 512 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 658 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14687 vs 4997 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55390 vs 24857 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 658 | 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4997 | 14687 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24857 | 55390 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP104 |
Launch date | 28 Jun 2022 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 233 | 236 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 57.12 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.828 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 28.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 57.12 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Height | 18 mm, 0.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm, 5.7 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |