NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon HD 7970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 8.7x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1375 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39479 vs 34541
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 9448
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 9448
- Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 2276
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 22 December 2011 |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1375 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39479 vs 34541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 vs 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 vs 9448 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 vs 2276 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1982
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1982
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 1982 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 1982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6420 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39479 | 34541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 | 2276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.381 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1389.754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N18P-G62 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 22 December 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 437 | 483 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 274 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro S10000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 8830M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 270X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon E6465
