NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 852 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6514 vs 2853
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 118
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 7410
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 7410
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 26 August 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 852 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6514 vs 2853 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 vs 118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 vs 7410 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 vs 7410 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6937 vs 2168
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2647 vs 1982
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6937 vs 2168
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2647 vs 1982
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6937 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2647 vs 1982 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6937 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2647 vs 1982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6514 | 2853 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 118 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39228 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | 7410 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | 6937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 2647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | 7410 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | 6937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 2647 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | N18P-G62 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 26 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 425 | 426 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 852 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 280
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro V340 MxGPU
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs
IntelArc A550M
