NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 837 MHz
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 876 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2000x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39198 vs 24400
• Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 2901

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

• 2.6x more pipelines: 2688 vs 1024
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8192 vs 6470
• Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 336
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 vs 9780
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2168
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1982
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 vs 9780
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2168
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6470 8192
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	336 648
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39198 24400
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9780 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2168 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1982 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9780 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2168 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1982 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3172 2901

Compare specifications (specs)