AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 63% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Around 95% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1485 MHz
3.4x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 12180
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 12180

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 Jun 2021 vs 2 Apr 2020
Core clock speed	2200 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	2903 MHz vs 1485 MHz
Texture fill rate	325.1 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
Pipelines	1792 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15257 vs 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15257 vs 12180

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 80 Watt
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3716
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3716
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3358
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3358

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15257

12180

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15257

12180

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

8926

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

8926

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

8062

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

8062

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W6600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15257	12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15257	12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	8926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	8062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	8062
PassMark - G3D Mark		7568
PassMark - G2D Mark		389
Geekbench - OpenCL		41946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		151.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		115.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		644.054
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3667

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W6600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 23	TU117
Launch date	8 Jun 2021	2 Apr 2020
Place in performance rating	270	273
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2903 MHz	1485 MHz
Compute units	28
Core clock speed	2200 MHz	1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	650.3 GFLOPS (1:16)	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	20.81 TFLOPS (2:1)	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	10.40 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1792	1024
Pixel fill rate	185.8 GPixel/s	47.52 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	325.1 GTexel/s	95.04 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	11060 million	4700 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6