NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 480

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon RX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1120 MHz
• Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 103.851
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 769.541
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 7.593
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 67.879

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 480

• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8578 vs 7881
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 564
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 vs 39165
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 vs 573.418
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 vs 10959
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 vs 10959
• 3.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 966 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 8578
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 774
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 39538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 103.851
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 769.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 7.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 67.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 597.772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 966

Compare specifications (specs)