NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1156 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1471 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 5x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 79.32

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13093 vs 7881
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 564
• 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 39165
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 184.405 vs 134.765
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1765.06 vs 1316.075
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.606 vs 8.799
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1022.925 vs 573.418
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14462 vs 10959
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14462 vs 10959
• 4.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1501 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 13093
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 768
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 163998
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 184.405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 1765.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 12.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 79.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 1022.925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 14462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 14462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 1501

Compare specifications (specs)