NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon X800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and ATI Radeon X800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 475 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 110 nm
- 8.1x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 986 MHz
- 93.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7878 vs 84
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 423
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 1 November 2005 |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 110 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 986 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 vs 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 423 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | ATI Radeon X800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 | 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 423 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 324 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | ATI Radeon X800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | R400 |
Code name | TU107 | R430 |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 1 November 2005 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Place in performance rating | 382 | 385 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 110 nm |
Texture fill rate | 3.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Transistor count | 160 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 986 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 31.55 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR |