NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 513 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 90 nm
- 5.1x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1584 MHz
- 19.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 412
- 18.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 31
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 12 February 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 513 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 90 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1584 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 vs 412 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 31 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 412 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 31 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Tesla |
Code name | TU107 | G80 |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 12 February 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $269 |
Place in performance rating | 376 | 1640 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 513 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 90 nm |
Floating-point performance | 228.1 gflops | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 12.31 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 143 Watt | |
Transistor count | 681 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1584 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 320 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |