NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 954 MHz
• Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 993 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 1516
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 172
• 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 6325
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 28.91
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 312.94
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 1.83
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 27.833
• 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 103.937
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 2486
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3587
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 2486
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3587

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

• Around 92% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 585 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 1516
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 172
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 6325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 28.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 312.94
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 1.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 27.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 103.937
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 2486
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3587
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 2486
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3587
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 585

Compare specifications (specs)